CA Singhal Ajay Kumar, a Rank Holder in CA Final Exams held in Nov 1992 and is the Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) & Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received BEST Study Circle Award, BEST Dy. Convener Award, BEST Convener award.
Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed Rs. 5,01,000/- to CABF, an INITIATIVE for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession.
I seek your BLESSING, SUPPORT & VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with a lust to serve the Profession.
Message By CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
It is my pride and pleasure to introduce my Childhood Friend - CA SINGHAL AJAY KUMAR, FCA, a core and true professional, who is contesting forthcoming election of NIRC of ICAI.
He has been with me time and again in various era of life like roommate during CA Studies, Dy. Convener of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle and strong family bonding as well.
He is a brilliant scholar (35th rank in CA Final) and merit holder in ICWA. A person of full of energy, having dynamic personality and has very good qualities to usher us into this profession. I have no doubt that he will strive his best to take our Institute and fraternity to achieve greater heights of professional dignity and fulfillment.
He is a Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. Besides, FCA, he is also ACS, AICWA, MBA, LL.B. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) when I was the Convener, and Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received Best Study Circle Award, Best Dy. Convener Award,
and Best Convener award. Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed a sum of Rs.5,01,000/- to CABF, an initiative for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession for which VMCA has also been awarded "Special Contribution by the Study Circle Award" by the NIRC.
Being in the core practice of CA, he is fully supported by his better half, CA Archana Singhal, FCA, LL.B., DISA, IFRS.
I most humbly request you for your blessings, open hearted support and FIRST preference VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with an aspiration to serve the Profession with his all integrity and sincerity.
With best regards,
Professionally yours,
CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
(1) Where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any statement included, or the inclusion or omission of any matter, in the prospectus which is misleading and has sustained any loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company and every person who—
(a)
is a director of the company at the time of the issue of the prospectus;
(b)
has authorised himself to be named and is named in the prospectus as a director of the company, or has agreed to become such director, either immediately or after an interval of time;
(c)
is a promoter of the company;
(d)
has authorised the issue of the prospectus; and
(e)
is an expert referred to in sub-section (5) of section 26,
shall, without prejudice to any punishment to which any person may be liable under section 36, be liable to pay compensation to every person who has sustained such loss or damage.
(2) No person shall be liable under sub-section (1), if he proves—
(a)
that, having consented to become a director of the company, he withdrew his consent before the issue of the prospectus, and that it was issued without his authority or consent; or
(b)
that the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on becoming aware of its issue, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice that it was issued without his knowledge or consent;
[(c)
that, as regards every misleading statement purported to be made by an expert or contained in what purports to be a copy of or an extract from a report or valuation of an expert, it was a correct and fair representation of the statement, or a correct copy of, or a correct and fair extract from, the report or valuation ; and he had reasonable ground to believe and did up to the time of the issue of the prospectus believe, that the person making the statement was competent to make it and that the said person had given the consent required by sub-section (5) of section 26 to the issue of the prospectus and had not withdrawn that consent before [filing of a copy of the prospectus with the Registrar] or, to the defendant's knowledge, before allotment thereunder.]
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where it is proved that a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose, every person referred to in sub-section (1) shall be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by any person who subscribed to the securities on the basis of such prospectus