CA Singhal Ajay Kumar, a Rank Holder in CA Final Exams held in Nov 1992 and is the Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) & Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received BEST Study Circle Award, BEST Dy. Convener Award, BEST Convener award.
Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed Rs. 5,01,000/- to CABF, an INITIATIVE for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession.
I seek your BLESSING, SUPPORT & VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with a lust to serve the Profession.
Message By CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
It is my pride and pleasure to introduce my Childhood Friend - CA SINGHAL AJAY KUMAR, FCA, a core and true professional, who is contesting forthcoming election of NIRC of ICAI.
He has been with me time and again in various era of life like roommate during CA Studies, Dy. Convener of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle and strong family bonding as well.
He is a brilliant scholar (35th rank in CA Final) and merit holder in ICWA. A person of full of energy, having dynamic personality and has very good qualities to usher us into this profession. I have no doubt that he will strive his best to take our Institute and fraternity to achieve greater heights of professional dignity and fulfillment.
He is a Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. Besides, FCA, he is also ACS, AICWA, MBA, LL.B. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) when I was the Convener, and Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received Best Study Circle Award, Best Dy. Convener Award,
and Best Convener award. Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed a sum of Rs.5,01,000/- to CABF, an initiative for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession for which VMCA has also been awarded "Special Contribution by the Study Circle Award" by the NIRC.
Being in the core practice of CA, he is fully supported by his better half, CA Archana Singhal, FCA, LL.B., DISA, IFRS.
I most humbly request you for your blessings, open hearted support and FIRST preference VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with an aspiration to serve the Profession with his all integrity and sincerity.
With best regards,
Professionally yours,
CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
44.Appearance before wealth-tax authorities by authorised representatives.
(1) Any assessee who is entitled to or required to attend before any wealth- tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal in connection with any proceeding under this Act, except where he is required under this Act to attend in person, may attend by a person who would be entitled to represent him before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal under section 288 of the Income-tax Act.
(2) Notwithstanding anything in sub-section (1)—
(i)
no person who has been convicted of an offence connected with any wealth-tax proceeding or on whom a penalty has been imposed under this Act other than a penalty imposed on him under clause (i) or clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 18 shall be qualified to represent an assessee under sub-section (1) for such time as the 18[Chief Commissioner or Commissioner] may by order determine;
if any person who is not a legal practitioner or a chartered accountant, is found guilty of misconduct in connection with any wealth-tax proceeding by the prescribed authority, the prescribed authority may direct that he shall thenceforth be disqualified to represent an assessee under sub-section (1);
(iii)
no person not qualified to represent an assessee under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (34 of 1953), the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957 (29 of 1957), or the Gift-tax Act, 1958 (18 of 1958), shall be entitled to appear on behalf of any assessee under this Act:
Provided that any order or direction under clause (i) or clause (ii) shall be subject to the following conditions, namely :—
(a)
no such order or direction shall be made in respect of any person unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard;
(b)
any person against whom any such order or direction is made may, within one month of the making of the order or direction, appeal to the Board to have the order or direction cancelled; and
(c)
no such order or direction shall take effect until the expiration of one month from the making thereof, or, where an appeal has been preferred, until the disposal of the appeal.]