CA Singhal Ajay Kumar, a Rank Holder in CA Final Exams held in Nov 1992 and is the Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) & Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received BEST Study Circle Award, BEST Dy. Convener Award, BEST Convener award.
Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed Rs. 5,01,000/- to CABF, an INITIATIVE for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession.
I seek your BLESSING, SUPPORT & VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with a lust to serve the Profession.
Message By CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
It is my pride and pleasure to introduce my Childhood Friend - CA SINGHAL AJAY KUMAR, FCA, a core and true professional, who is contesting forthcoming election of NIRC of ICAI.
He has been with me time and again in various era of life like roommate during CA Studies, Dy. Convener of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle and strong family bonding as well.
He is a brilliant scholar (35th rank in CA Final) and merit holder in ICWA. A person of full of energy, having dynamic personality and has very good qualities to usher us into this profession. I have no doubt that he will strive his best to take our Institute and fraternity to achieve greater heights of professional dignity and fulfillment.
He is a Member of ICAI since Jan 1993. Besides, FCA, he is also ACS, AICWA, MBA, LL.B. He has been Dy. Convener (2005-06) when I was the Convener, and Convener (2006-08 & 2011-14) of Vikas Marg CA Study Circle, Delhi (VMCA). During his tenure as Convener, he received Best Study Circle Award, Best Dy. Convener Award,
and Best Convener award. Further, under his Convenership, VMCA has contributed a sum of Rs.5,01,000/- to CABF, an initiative for NOBLE cause for the Members in CA Profession for which VMCA has also been awarded "Special Contribution by the Study Circle Award" by the NIRC.
Being in the core practice of CA, he is fully supported by his better half, CA Archana Singhal, FCA, LL.B., DISA, IFRS.
I most humbly request you for your blessings, open hearted support and FIRST preference VOTE for CA. Singhal Ajay Kumar, a true academician and dynamic personality with an aspiration to serve the Profession with his all integrity and sincerity.
With best regards,
Professionally yours,
CA GOPAL JI AGARWAL
Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case may be, in each public authority:
Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
(2)
Where an appeal is preferred against an order made by a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, under section 11 to disclose third party information, the appeal by the concerned third party shall be made within thirty days from the date of the order.
(3)
A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission:
Provided that the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of ninety days if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
(4)
If the decision of the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, against which an appeal is preferred relates to information of a third party, the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to that third party.
(5)
In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.
(6)
An appeal under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be disposed of within thirty days of the receipt of the appeal or within such extended period not exceeding a total of forty-five days from the date of filing thereof, as the case may be, for reasons to be recorded in writing.
(7)
The decision of the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall be binding.
(8)
In its decision, the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, has the power to—
(a)
require the public authority to take any such steps as may be necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of this Act, including—
(i)
by providing access to information, if so requested, in a particular form;
(ii)
by appointing a Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be;
(iii)
by publishing certain information or categories of information;
(iv)
by making necessary changes to its practices in relation to the maintenance, management and destruction of records;
(v)
by enhancing the provision of training on the right to information for its officials;
(vi)
by providing it with an annual report in compliance with clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 4;
(b)
require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered;
(c)
impose any of the penalties provided under this Act;
(d)
reject the application.
(9)
The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall give notice of its decision, including any right of appeal, to the complainant and the public authority.
(10)
The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall decide the appeal in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed.